Policyholder Pulse
Since taking office, President Trump has issued sweeping executive orders targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives across federal agencies and directing agencies to take action to encourage private organizations to follow suit. On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed executive orders (EOs) titled Ending Racial and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. The following day, he issued another EO titled Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity. On January 22, 2025, the White House published a Fact Sheet providing guidance related to these orders. Many states were early adopters of such initiatives—e.g., in 2023 Florida passed a bill banning DEI initiatives in public colleges—or are now following suit in dismantling these programs as well within state agencies and institutions (such as Indiana, Mississippi, West Virginia, among others).
As of January 13, Southern California’s ongoing wildfires have reportedly destroyed more than 12,000 structures. Insured loss estimates exceed $25 billion, and the strong Santa Ana winds fanning the blazes are expected to continue into Wednesday.
In the last few years, the video game industry has been hit with 
In what was likely a shock to coal-fired electric utilities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held on June 28, 2024, that proposed decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in January 2022—prohibiting coal-fired power plants from closing coal ash impoundments where coal ash is in contact with groundwater—were a “straightforward application” of a previously promulgated agency rule. In 
The Illinois Supreme Court handed down a big win for policyholders just in time for the holidays. In 
Courts don’t look kindly upon insurance company shell games. In 
It is a settled principle of insurance law that a liability insurer’s duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify. In most jurisdictions, if any portion of a complaint against a policyholder is even potentially covered, the insurer must defend the entire action.
When Illinois enacted the Biometric Information Privacy Act in 2008 (BIPA), the concept of “biometric privacy protection” was foreign to many observers. Yet less than 20 years later, consumers are familiar with the concept of biometric privacy and class action plaintiffs’ lawyers have spotted an opportunity. As many other states and cities have enacted (or are in the process of enacting) analogous biometric privacy laws, class actions are likely to increase. And like night follows day, insurers will look for ways to avoid their obligations to cover these claims.
Four months ago, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the